Онлайн-Книжки » Книги » 🤯 Психология » Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии - Майкл Газзанига

Читать книгу "Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии - Майкл Газзанига"

267
0

Шрифт:

-
+

Интервал:

-
+

Закладка:

Сделать
1 ... 68 69
Перейти на страницу:

38 Cm.: Baron-Cohen S. (1995) Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; а также Baron-Cohen S. et al. (1985) Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition. 21 (1): 37-46.

39 Rizzolatti G. et al. (1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research. 3 (2): 131-141.

40 Fadiga L. et al. (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology. 73 (6): 2608-2611.

41 Singer T. et al. (2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective hut not sensory components of pain. Science. 303 (5661): 1157-1162.

42 Jackson P. L. et ai. (2005) How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neurolma-ge. 24 (3): 771-779-

43 Dimberg U. et al. (2000) Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science. 11 (1): 86-89.

44 Chartrand T. L., Bargh J. A. (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 76 (6): 893-910.

45 Giles H., Powesland P. F. (1975) Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.

46 См. обзор: Chartrand T. L. et al. (2005) Beyond the perception-behavior link: the ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In: Hassin R. R. et al. (eds.) The new unconscious (P. 334-361). NY: Oxford University Press.

47 Van Baaren R. B. et al. (2004) Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science. 15 (1): 71-74.

48 Chaiken S. (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39 (5): 752-766.

49 Hatfield E. et al. (1993) Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences. 2 (3): 96-99.

50 Lanzetta J. T., Englis B. G. (1989) Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers' vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 56 (4): 543-554.

51 Bourgeois R, Hess U. (1999) Emotional reactions to political leaders' facial displays: a replication. Psychophysiology. 36: S36.

52 Bourgeois R, Hess U. (2007) The impact of social context on mimicry. Biological Psychology. 77 (3): 343-352.

53 Доклад, представленный на конференции: Yabar Y. et al. (2001) Dis-moi si vous êtes intimes, je te dirais si tu mimes [Tell me if you're intimate and I'll tell you if you'll mimic]. 24th annual meeting of the Société Québécoise pour la Recherche en Psychologie. Chicoutimi, Canada.

54 De Waal F. (2001) The ape and the sushi master: cultural reflections of a primatologist. NY: Basic Books.

55 См.: Baner G., Harley H. (2001) The mimetic dolphin. Beha-viorial and Brain Sciences. 24 (2): 326-327. [Комментарий к статье Rendell L., Whitehead H. (2001) Culture in whales and dolphins. Behaviorial and Brain Sciences. 24 (2): 309-324.]

56 См.: Visalbergi-ii E., Fragaszy D. M. (1990) Do monkeys ape? In: Parker S.T., Gibson K.R. (eds.) Language and intelligence in monkeys and apes (E 247-273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; а также Whiten A., Ham R. (1992) On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: reappraisal of a century of research. In: Slater P.J.B. et al. (eds.) Advances in the study of behavior (P. 239-283). NY: Academic Press.

57 Kumashiro M. et al. (2003) Natural imitation induced by joint attention in Japanese monkeys. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 50 (1-2): 81-99.

58 Hume D. (1777) An enquiry concerning the principles of morals (i960 ed., P. 2). La Salle, IL: Open Court.[48]

59 Brown D. E. (1991) Human universals. NY: McGraw-Hill.

60 Haidt J. (2010) Morality. In: Fiske S.T. et al. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., V. 2, P. 797-832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

61 Haidt J. (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review. 108 (4): 814-834.

62 Haidt J., Bjorklund F. (2008) Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (ed.) Moral psychology (V 2, P 181-217). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

63 Westermarck E. A. (1891) The history of human marriage. NY: Macmillan.

64 См.: ShepherJ. (1983) Incest: a biosocial view. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; а также Wolf A. P. (1970) Childhood association and sexual attraction: a further test of the Westermarck hypothesis. American Anthropologist. 72 (3): 864-874.

65 Lieberman D. et al. (2002) Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B: Biological Sciences. 270 (1517): 819-826.

66 Greene J. D. et al. (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science. 293 (5537): 2105-2108.

67 Hauser M. (2006) Moral minds. NY: Harper Collins.

68 Koenigs M. et al. (2007) Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature. 446: 908-911.

69 Pinker S. (2008, January 13) The moral instinct. The New York Times. Cm.: http://nytimes.com

70 См.: Haidt J., Joseph C. (2004) Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus. 133 (4): 55-66; а также Haidt J., Bjorklund F. (2008) Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (ed.) Moral psychology (V. 2, P 181-217). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

71 Darwin C. (1871) The descent of man. In: Adler M.J. (ed.) Great books of the western world (1952 ed., V. 49, P 322). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.[49]

72 Knoch D. et al. (2006) Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science. 314 (5800): 829-832.

73 Anderson S. W. et al. (1999) Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2 (11): 1032-1037.

1 ... 68 69
Перейти на страницу:

Внимание!

Сайт сохраняет куки вашего браузера. Вы сможете в любой момент сделать закладку и продолжить прочтение книги «Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии - Майкл Газзанига», после закрытия браузера.

Комментарии и отзывы (0) к книге "Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии - Майкл Газзанига"