Читать книгу "Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии - Майкл Газзанига"

21 Libet B. et al. (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential): the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain. 106 (3): 623-642.

22 Soon C. S. et al. (2008) Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience. 11 (5): 543-545.

23 Prinz A. A. et al. (2004) Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters. Nature Neuroscience. 7 (12): 1345-1352.

24 Anderson P. W. (1972) More is different. Science. 177 (4047): 393-396.

25 Locke J. (1689) An essay concerning human understanding (1849 ed., P. 155). Philadelphia: Kay & Troutman.[47]

26 Krakauer D. Частная беседа.

27 Bassett D.S., Gazzaniga M.S. (2011) Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Science. 15 (5): 200-209.

Глава 5. Социальный разум

1 Legerstee M. (1991) The role of person and object in eliciting early imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 51 (3): 423-433.

2 См. обзор: Puce A., Perrett D. (2003) Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B: Biological Sciences. 358: 435-446.

3 Heider R, Simmel M. (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology. 57 (2): 243-259.

4 Premack D., Premack A. (1997) Infants attribute value to the goal-directed actions of self-propelled objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 9 (6): 848-856.

5 Hamlin J. K. et al. (2007) Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature. 450: 557-559.

6 Warneken R, Tomasello M. (2007) Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy. 11 (3): 271-294.

7 Warneken F. et al. (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology. 5 (7): 1414-1420.

8 Warneken F., Tomasello M. (2006) Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science. 311 (5765): 1301-1303.

9 Liszkowski U. et al. (2006) 12- and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development. 7 (2): 173-187.

10 Warneken F., Tomasello M. (2009) Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzees. Trends in Cognitive Science. 13 (9): 397-402.

11 Olson K. R., Spelke E. S. (2008) Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition. 108 (1): 222-231.

12 Melis A. P. et al. (2008) Do chimpanzees reciprocate received favours? Animal Behaviour. 76 (3): 951-962.

13 Rakoczy H. et al. (2008) The sources of normativity: young children's awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology. 44 (3): 875-881.

14 Stephens G.J. et al. (2010) Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (32): 14425-14430.

15 Jolly A. (1966) Lemur and social behavior and primate intelligence. Science. 153 (3735): 501-506.

16 Byrne R. W., Whiten A. (1988) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

17 Byrne R. W., Corp N. (2004) Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B: Biological Sciences. 271 (1549): 1693-1699.

18 Moll H., Tomasello M. (2007) Cooperation and human cognition: the Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B: Biological Sciences. 362 (1480): 639-648.

19 Dunbar R. I. M. (1998) The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology. 6 (5): 178-190.

20 Dunbar R. I. M. (1993) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 16 (4): 681-735.

21 Hill R. A., Dunbar R. I.M. (2003) Social network size in humans. Human Nature. 14 (1): 53-72.

22 Roberts S. G. B. et al. (2009) Exploring variation in active network size: constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks. 1 (2): 138-146.

23 Dunbar R. I. M. (1996) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

24 Papineau D. (2005) Social learning and the Baldwin effect. In: Zilhao A. (ed.) Evolution, rationality and cognition: a cognitive science for the twenty-first century (P. 40-60). NY: Routledge.

25 Baldwin J. M. (1896) A new factor in evolution. The American Naturalist. 30 (354): 441-451.

26 Krubitzer L., Kaas J. (2005) The evolution of the neocortex in mammals: how is phenotypic diversity generated? Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 15 (4): 444-453.

27 Lewontin R. C. (1982) Organism and environment. In: Plot-kin H. C. (ed.) Learning, development and culture: essays in evolutionary epistemology (P 151-171). NY: Wiley.

28 Odling-Smee F. J. et al. (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29 Flack J. C. et al. (2005) Social structure, robustness, and policing cost in a cognitively sophisticated species. The American Naturalist. 165 (5): E126 — E139.

30 Flack J. C. et al. (2005) Robustness mechanisms in primate societies: a perturbation study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B: Biological Sciences. 272 (1568): 1091-1099.

31 Belyaev D. (1979) Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity. 70 (5): 301-308.

32 Hare B. et al. (2005) Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology. 15 (3): 226-230.

33 Allport F. H. (1924) Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

34 Emler N. (1994) Gossip, reputation, and adaptation. In: Goodman R.F., Ben-Ze’ev A. (eds.) Good gossip (P. 117-138). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

35 Call J., Tomasello M. (2008) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? jo years later. Trends in Cognitive Science. 12 (5): 187-192.

36 Bloom P, German T. P. (2000) Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition. 77 (1): B25 — B31.

37 Buttelmann D. et al. (2009) Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition. 112 (2): 337-342.