Читать книгу "Уродливая Вселенная - Сабина Хоссенфельдер"

126 Larsen P. O., von Ins M. 2010. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 84 (3): 575–603.

127 Sinatra R. et al. 2015. A century of physics. Nat. Phys. 11: 791–796.

128 Palmer C. L. et al. 2004. Information at the intersections of discovery: case studies in neuroscience. Proc. Ass. Inf. Sci. Tech. 41: 448–455.

129 Uzzi B. et al. 2013. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science. 342 (6157): 468–472.

130 Sinatra R. et al. 2015. A century of physics. Nat. Phys. 11: 791–796.

131 King C. 2016. Single-author papers: a waning share of output, but still providing the tools for progress. Science Watch, retrieved January 2016. http://sciencewatch.com/articles/single-author-papers-waning-share-output- still-providing-tools-progress

132 Maher B., Anfres M. S. 2016. Young scientists under pressure: what the data show. Nature. 538: 44–45.

133 Von Hippel T., von Hippel C. 2015. To apply or not to apply: a survey analysis of grant writing costs and benefits. PLoS One. 10 (3): e0118494.

134 Chubba J., Watermeyer R. 2016 Feb. Artifice or integrity in the marketization of research impact? Investigating the moral economy of (pathways to) impact statements within research funding proposals in the UK and Australia. Stud. High. Edu. 42 (12): 2360–2372.

135 Shulman S. et al. 2016. Higher education at a crossroads: the economic value of tenure and the security of the profession. Academe, March—April 2016, pp. 9–23. www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/2015-16EconomicStatus Report.pdf

136 Brembs B. 2015. Booming university administrations. Björn.Brembs.Blog, January 7, 2015. http://bjoern.brembs.net/2015/01/booming-university-administrations

137 Foster J. G. et al. 2015. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80 (5): 875–908.

138 Weaver K. et al. 2007. Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: a repetitive voice can sound like a chorus. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92 (5): 821–833.

139 Odenwald S. 2015. The future of physics. Huffington Post, January 26, 2015. www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-sten-odenwald/the-future-of-physics_b_6506304.html

140 Lykken J., Spiropulu M. 2014. Supersymmetry and the crisis in physics. Scientific American, May 1, 2014.

141 Khosrovshahi G. B. n. d. Interview with Alain Connes. Retrieved January 2016. www.freewebs.com/cvdegosson/connes-interview.pdf

142 Kac M. 1966. Can one hear the shape of a drum? Amer. Math. Monthly. 73 (4): 1–23.

143 Chamseddine A. H. et al. 2007. Gravity and the standard model with neutrino mixing. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11: 991–1089. arXiv: hep-th/0610241.

144 Connes A. 2008. Irony. Noncommutative Geometry, August 4, 2008. http://noncommutativegeometry.blogspot.de/2008/08/irony.html

145 Chamseddine A. H., Connes A. 2012. Resilience of the spectral standard model. JHEP. 1209: 104. arXiv:1208.1030 [hep-ph].

146 Hebecker A., Wetterich W. 2003. Spinor gravity. Phys. Lett. B. 574: 269–275. arXiv: hep-th/0307109; Finster F., Kleiner J. 2015. Causal fermion systems as a candidate for a unified physical theory. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 626: 012020. arXiv:1502.03587 [math-ph].

147 Lisi A. G. 2007. An exceptionally simple theory of everything. arXiv:0711.0770 [hep-th].

148 Lisi A. G., Weatherall J. O. 2010. A geometric theory of everything. Scientific American, December 2010.

149 Kachru S. et al. 2003. De Sitter vacua in string theory. Phys. Rev. D68: 046005. arXiv: hep-th/0301240.

150 Hossenfelder S. 2013. Whatever happened to AdS/CFT and the quark gluon plasma? Backreaction, September 12, 2013. http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2013/09/whatever-happened-to-adscft-and-quark.html

151 Conlon J. 2015. Why string theory? Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 135.

152 Dyson F. 2009. Birds and frogs. Notices of the AMS. 56 (2): 221.

153 Замечательная книга о связи математики и теории струн: Yau S.-T., Nadis S. 2012. The shape of inner space: string theory and the geometry of the universe’s hidden dimensions. New York: Basic Books. (Яу Ш., Надис С. 2012. Теория струн и скрытые измерения Вселенной. СПб.: Питер. – Прим. перев.)

154 Очень понятно об этой связи рассказывается здесь: Ronan M. 2006. Symmetry and the monster: the story of one of the greatest quests of mathematics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

155 Polchinski J. 2015. String theory to the rescue. arXiv:1512.02477 [hep-th].

156 Polchinski J. 2004. Monopoles, duality, and string theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19S1: 145–156. arXiv: hep-th/0304042.

157 Almheiri A. et al. 2013. Black holes: complementarity or firewalls? J. High. Energ. Phys. 2013 (2): 62. arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th].

158 Greene A. 2014. Stephen King: the Rolling Stone interview. Rolling Stone, October 31, 2014.

159 Conlon J. 2015. Why string theory? Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 236.

160 Witten E. 2003. Viewpoints on string theory. Nova: The Elegant Universe. PBS. www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/viewpoints.html

161 Brink L., Henneaux M. 1988. Principles of string theory. Boston: Springer.

162 Greene B. 1999. The elegant universe: superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. New York: WW Norton, p. 82.

163 Cheng Z., Wen X.-G. 2012. Emergence of helicity +/– 2 modes (gravitons) from qubit models. Nucl. Phys. B. 863: 90–129. arXiv:0907.1203 [gr-qc].

164 Vinkers C. H. et al. 2015. Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis. BMJ. 351: h6467.

165 Freese K. 2014. Cosmic cocktail: three parts dark matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

166 Feng J. L. 2008. Collider physics and cosmology. Class. Quant. Grav. 25: 114003. arXiv:0801.1334 [gr-qc]; Buckley R. B., Randall L. 2011. Xogenesis. J. High. Energ. Phys. 1109: 009. arXiv:1009.0270 [hep-ph].